The interpretation offered emphasized the economic weight and the political power of non-industrial but still capitalist forms of enterprise in the period 1688-1945. Part I suggested a way of approaching British history which avoided the stereotypes on which both Marxist and liberal historians of imperialism have tended to rely. This article carries forward the interpretation set out in Part I, which was published in the last issue of the Review (XXXIX, 4, Nov.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |